specs/specs/approved/pegleg-secrets.rst

15 KiB

single: template single: creating specs

Pegleg Secret Generation and Encryption

Pegleg is responsible for shepherding deployment manifest documents from their resting places in Git repositories to a consumable format that is ready for ingestion into Airship. This spec expands its responsibility to account for secure generation and encryption of secrets that are required within an Airship-based deployment.

The work to author and implement this spec will be tracked under this Storyboard Story.

Problem description

Airship supports the ability to identify secret information required for functioning deployments, such as passwords and keys; to ingest it into the site in a least-privilege-oriented fashion; and to encrypt it at rest within Deckhand. However, lifecycle management of the secrets outside the site should be made automatable and repeatable, to facilitate operational needs such as periodic password rotation, and to ensure that unencrypted secrets are only accessible by authorized individuals.

Impacted components

The following Airship components will be impacted by this solution:

  1. Pegleg: enhanced to generate, rotate, encrypt, and decrypt secrets.
  2. Promenade: PKICatalog will move to Pegleg.
  3. Treasuremap: site manifests augmented to support the updated Secrets schema.
  4. Airship-in-a-Bottle: site manifests augmented to support the updated Secrets schema.

Proposed change

PeglegManagedDocument

With this spec, the role of Pegleg grows from being a custodian of deployment manifests to additionally being the author of certain manifests. A new YAML schema will be created to describe these documents: pegleg/PeglegManagedDocument/v1. Documents of this type will have one or both of the following data elements, although more may be added in the future: generated, encrypted. PeglegManagedDocuments serve as wrappers around other documents, and the wrapping serves to capture additional metadata that is necessary, but separate from the managed document proper. The managed document data will live in the data.managedDocument portion of a PeglegManagedDocument.

If a PeglegManagedDocument is generated, then its contents have been created by Pegleg, and it must include provenance information per this example:

schema: pegleg/PeglegManagedDocument/v1
metadata:
  name: matches-document-name
  schema: deckhand/Document/v1
  labels:
    matching: wrapped-doc
  layeringDefinition:
    abstract: false
    # Pegleg will initially support generation at site level only
    layer: site
  storagePolicy: encrypted
data:
  generated:
    at: <timestamp>
    by: <author>
    specifiedBy:
      repo: <...>
      reference: <git ref-head or similar>
      path: <PKICatalog/PassphraseCatalog details>
  managedDocument:
    metadata:
      storagePolicy: encrypted
      schema: <as appropriate for wrapped document>
      <metadata from parent PeglegManagedDocument>
      <any other metadata as appropriate>
    data: <generated data>

If a PeglegManagedDocument is encrypted, then its contents have been encrypted by Pegleg, and it must include provenance information per this example:

schema: pegleg/PeglegManagedDocument/v1
metadata:
  name: matches-document-name
  schema: deckhand/Document/v1
  labels:
    matching: wrapped-doc
  layeringDefinition:
    abstract: false
    layer: matching-wrapped-doc
  storagePolicy: encrypted
data:
  encrypted:
    at: <timestamp>
    by: <author>
  managedDocument:
    metadata:
      storagePolicy: encrypted
      schema: <as appropriate for wrapped document>
      <metadata from parent PeglegManagedDocument>
      <any other metadata as appropriate>
    data: <encrypted string blob>

A PeglegManagedDocument that is both generated via a Catalog, and encrypted (as specified by the catalog) will contain both generated and encrypted stanzas.

Note that this encrypted has a different purpose than the Deckhand storagePolicy: encrypted metadata, which indicates an intent for Deckhand to store a document encrypted at rest in the cluster. The two can be used together to ensure security, however: if a document is marked as storagePolicy: encrypted, then automation may validate that it is only persisted (e.g. to a Git repository) if it is in fact encrypted within a PeglegManagedDocument.

Document Generation

Document generation will follow the pattern established by Promenade's PKICatalog pattern. In fact, PKICatalog management responsibility will move to Pegleg as part of this effort. The types of documents that are expected to be generated are certificates and keys, which are defined via PKICatalog documents now, and passphrases, which will be defined via a new pegleg/PassphraseCatalog/v1 document. Longer-term, these specifications may be combined, or split further (into a CertificateCatalog and KeypairCatalog), but this is not needed in the initial implementation in Pegleg. A collection of manifests may define more than one of each of these secret catalog documents if desired.

The documents generated via PKICatalog and PassphraseCatalog will follow the PeglegManagedDocument schema above; note that this is a change to existing PKICatalog behavior. The PKICatalog schema and associated code should be copied to Pegleg (and renamed to pegleg/PKICatalog/v1), and during a transition period the old and new PKICatalog implementations will exist side-by-side with slightly different semantics. Promenade's PKICatalog can be removed once all deployment manifests have been updated to use the new one.

Pegleg will place generated document files in <site>/secrets/passphrases/, <site>/secrets/certificates, or <site>/secrets/keypairs as appropriate:

  • The generated filenames for passphrases will follow the pattern <passphrase-doc-name>.yaml.
  • The generated filenames for certificate authorities will follow the pattern <ca-name>_ca.yaml.
  • The generated filenames for certificates will follow the pattern <ca-name>_<certificate-doc-name>_certificate.yaml.
  • The generated filenames for certificate keys will follow the pattern <ca-name>_<certificate-doc-name>_key.yaml.
  • The generated filenames for keypairs will follow the pattern <keypair-doc-name>.yaml.
  • Dashes in the document names will be converted to underscores for consistency.

A PassphraseCatalog will capture the following example structure:

schema: pegleg/PassphraseCatalog/v1
metadata:
  schema: metadata/Document/v1
  name: cluster-passphrases
  layeringDefinition:
    abstract: false
    layer: site
  storagePolicy: cleartext
data:
  passphrases:
    - document_name: osh-nova-password
      description: Service password for Nova
      encrypted: true
    - document_name: osh-nova-oslo-db-password
      description: Database password for Nova
      encrypted: true
      length: 12

The nonobvious bits of the document described above are:

  • encrypted is optional, and denotes whether the generated PeglegManagedDocument will be encrypted, as well as whether the wrapped document will have storagePolicy: encrypted or storagePolicy: cleartext metadata. If absent, encrypted defaults to true.
  • document_name is required, and is used to create the filename of the generated PeglegManagedDocument manifest, and the metadata.name of the wrapped deckhand/Passphrase/v1 document. In both cases, Pegleg will replace dashes in the document_name with underscores.
  • length is optional, and denotes the length in characters of the generated cleartext passphrase data. If absent, length defaults to 24.
  • description is optional.

The encrypted key will be added to the PKICatalog schema, and adds the same semantics to PKICatalog-based generation as are described above for PassphraseCatalog.

Pegleg CLI Changes

The Pegleg CLI interface will be extended as follows. These commands will create PeglegManagedDocument manifests in the local repository. Committing and pushing the changes will be left to the operator or to script-based automation.

For the CLI commands below which encrypt or decrypt secrets, an environment variable (e.g. $PEGLEG_KEY will be use to capture the key/passphrase to use. pegleg site secrets rotate will use a second variable (e.g. $PEGLEG_PREVIOUS_KEY) to hold the key/passphrase being rotated out.

pegleg site secrets generate passphrases: Generate passphrases according to all PassphraseCatalog documents in the site. Note that regenerating passphrases can be accomplished simply by re-running pegleg site secrets generate passphrases.

pegleg site secrets generate pki: Generate certificates and keys according to all PKICatalog documents in the site. Note that regenerating certificates can be accomplished simply by re-running pegleg site secrets generate pki.

pegleg site secrets generate: Combines the two commands above. May be expanded in the future to include other manifest generation activities.

pegleg site bootstrap: For now, a synonym for pegleg site secrets generate, and may be expanded in the future to include other bootstrapping activities.

pegleg site secrets encrypt: Encrypt all site documents which have metadata.storagePolicy: encrypted, and which are not already encrypted within a wrapping PeglegManagedDocument. Note that the pegleg site secrets generate commands encrypt generated secrets as specified, so pegleg site secrets encrypt is intended mainly for external-facing secrets which a deployment engineer brings to the site manifests. The output PeglegManagedDocument will be written back to the filename that served as its source.

pegleg site secrets decrypt <document YAML file>: Decrypt a specific PeglegManagedDocument manifest, unwrapping it and outputting the cleartext original document YAML to standard output. This is intended to be used when an authorized deployment engineer needs to determine a particular cleartext secret for a specific operational purpose.

pegleg site secrets rotate: This action re-encrypts encrypted secrets with a new key/passphrase, and it takes the previously-used key and a new key as input. It accomplishes its task via two activities:

  • For encrypted secrets that were imported from outside of Pegleg (i.e. PeglegManagedDocuments which lack the generated stanza), decrypt them with the old key (in-memory), re-encrypt them with the new key, and output the results.
  • Perform a fresh pegleg site secrets generate process using the new key. This will replace all generated secrets with new secret values for added security. There is an assumption here that the only actors that need to know generated secrets are the services within the Airship-managed cluster, not external services or deployment engineers, except perhaps for point-in-time troubleshooting or operational exercises.

Driving deployment of a site directly via Pegleg is follow-on functionality which will collect site documents, use them to create the genesis.sh script, and then interact directly with Shipyard to drive deployments. Its details are beyond the scope of this spec, but when implemented, it should decrypt documents wrapped by applicable PeglegManagedDocuments at the lst responsible moment, and take care not to write, log, or stdout them to disk as cleartext.

Note that existing pegleg collect functionality should not be changed to decrypt encrypted secrets; this is because it writes its output to disk. If pegleg collect is called, at this point in time, the PeglegManagedDocuments will be written (encrypted) to disk. To enable special case full site secret decryption, a --force-decrypt flag will be added to pegleg collect to do this under controlled circumstances, and to help bridge the gap with existing CICD pipelines until Pegleg-driven site deployment is in place. It will leverage the $PEGLEG_KEY variable described above.

Secret Generation

The rstr library should be invoked to generate secrets of the appropriate length and character set. This library uses the os.urandom() function, which in turn leverages /dev/urandom on Linux, and it is suitable for cryptographic purposes.

Characters in generated secrets will be evenly distributed across lower-and upper-case letters, digits, and punctuation in !"#$%&'()*+,-./:;<=>?@[]^_`{|}~. Note this is equivalent to the union of Python string.ascii_letters, string.digits, and string.punctuation.

Secret Encryption

Details around encryption will be defined in a follow-on patch set to this spec.

Security impact

These changes will result in a system that handles site secrets in a highly secure manner, in the face of multiple roles and day 2 operational needs.

Performance impact

Performance impact to existing flows will be minimal. Pegleg will need to additionally decrypt secrets as part of site deployment, but this will be an efficient operation performed once per deployment.

Alternatives

The Python secrets library presents a convenient interface for generating random strings. However, it was introduced in Python 3.6, and it would be limiting to introduce this constraint on Airship CICD pipelines.

The strgen library presents an even more convenient interface for generating pseudo-random strings; however, it leverages the Python random library, which is unsuitably random for cryptographic purposes.

Deckhand already supports a storagePolicy element which indicates whether whether Deckhand will persist document data in an encrypted state, and this flag could have been re-used by Pegleg to indicate whether a secret is (or should be) encrypted. However, "should this data be encrypted" is a fundamentally different question than "is this data encrypted now", and additional metadata-esque parameters (generated, generatedLength) were desired as well, so this proposal adds data.encrypted to indicate the point-in-time encryption status. storagePolicy is still valuable in this context to make sure everything that should be encrypted is, prior to performing actions with it (e.g. Git commits).

This proposed implementation writes the output of generation/encryption events back to the same source files from which the original data came. This is a destructive operation; however, it wasn't evident that it is problematic in any anticipated workflow. In addition, it sidesteps challenges around naming of generated files, and cleanup of original files.

Implementation

Please refer to the Storyboard Story for implementation planning information.

Dependencies

This work should be based on the patchset to add Git branch and revision support to Pegleg, if it is not merged by the time implementation begins. This patchset alters the CLI interface and Git repository management code, and basing on it will avoid future refactoring.

References